IL32 ELISA Kits Search Results


90
Sino Biological human il32 elisa kit
Human Il32 Elisa Kit, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/IL32+ELISA+Kits/Human+IL32+ELISA+Kit/custom%40kit11064%4033707686
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human il32 elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Cusabio immunosorbent assay elisa
Immunosorbent Assay Elisa, supplied by Cusabio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/IL32+ELISA+Kits/Human+Interleukin+32(IL-32)+ELISA+Kit/pmc03797434-112-2-13
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
immunosorbent assay elisa - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems human il 32 duoset elisa kit
Human Il 32 Duoset Elisa Kit, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/IL32+ELISA+Kits/Human+IL-32+DuoSet+ELISA/pm35428295-115-0-5
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human il 32 duoset elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
R&D Systems il 32 duoset elisa kit
Il 32 Duoset Elisa Kit, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/IL32+ELISA+Kits/Human+IL-32+DuoSet+ELISA/pm31311800-90-14-18
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
il 32 duoset elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

91
Cusabio il 32 specific enzyme linked immunosorbent assay elisa
Il 32 Specific Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay Elisa, supplied by Cusabio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/IL32+ELISA+Kits/IL32/pmc03797434-112-0-13
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
il 32 specific enzyme linked immunosorbent assay elisa - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Sino Biological immunosorbent assay elisa kit
Immunosorbent Assay Elisa Kit, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/IL32+ELISA+Kits/Human+Interleukin-32+%2F+IL-32+ELISA+Pair+Set/pmc08115232-113-23-29
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
immunosorbent assay elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Shanghai Korain Biotech Co Ltd elisa kit
Elisa Kit, supplied by Shanghai Korain Biotech Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/IL32+ELISA+Kits/Human+Interleukin+32/pm40542051-71-91-93
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Jingmei Biotech Co Ltd human ccl20 elisa kit
Human Ccl20 Elisa Kit, supplied by Jingmei Biotech Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/IL32+ELISA+Kits/ccl20+elisa+human+kit/pmc13039810-377-26-30
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human ccl20 elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Jingmei Biotech Co Ltd human igf2 elisa kit
A KEGG pathway analysis of G-heporgs and S-heporgs. B Heatmap showing ligands and receptors in G-heporgs and S-heporgs. C Matched signaling of <t>IGF2</t> and IGF1R using STRING database. D Expressions of IGF2 and IGF1R were analyzed by RT-qPCR in different organoids. n = 4 biologically independent experiments. E IGF2 secretion from culture medium at different days (day 1 was the first day that observed the generation of G-heporgs). n = 4 biologically independent experiments. F Immunostaining for IGF1R and Ki67. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Scale bar = 25 μm. G Experimental strategy to evaluate the effect of exogenous IGF2 and LY294002 (PI3K-AKT inhibitor) on G-heporgs. H Representative morphologies of G-heporgs after the treatment with or without IGF2 and LY294002 at different days. Scale bar = 100 μm. I Quantification of the formation efficiency ( n = 4 biologically independent experiments) and diameter ( n = 40 organoids) of G-heporgs at day 14 after different treatments. J Immunostaining of ASGPR, HNF4α, ALB, Ecad and Ki67 for G-heporgs treated with IGF2. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Scale bar = 50 μm. K Western blot assessment for the expression of p-AKT(Thr308), AKT, p-GSK3β(Ser9) and GSK3β in G-heporgs after different treatments. L Schematic illustration of cell-cell interactions between G-heporgs and S-heporgs. Results were presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using one‑way ANOVA followed by Tukey post‑test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Human Igf2 Elisa Kit, supplied by Jingmei Biotech Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/IL32+ELISA+Kits/elisa+kits/pmc13039810-377-11-15
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human igf2 elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MyBiosource Biotechnology human il-32 γ elisa kit
A KEGG pathway analysis of G-heporgs and S-heporgs. B Heatmap showing ligands and receptors in G-heporgs and S-heporgs. C Matched signaling of <t>IGF2</t> and IGF1R using STRING database. D Expressions of IGF2 and IGF1R were analyzed by RT-qPCR in different organoids. n = 4 biologically independent experiments. E IGF2 secretion from culture medium at different days (day 1 was the first day that observed the generation of G-heporgs). n = 4 biologically independent experiments. F Immunostaining for IGF1R and Ki67. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Scale bar = 25 μm. G Experimental strategy to evaluate the effect of exogenous IGF2 and LY294002 (PI3K-AKT inhibitor) on G-heporgs. H Representative morphologies of G-heporgs after the treatment with or without IGF2 and LY294002 at different days. Scale bar = 100 μm. I Quantification of the formation efficiency ( n = 4 biologically independent experiments) and diameter ( n = 40 organoids) of G-heporgs at day 14 after different treatments. J Immunostaining of ASGPR, HNF4α, ALB, Ecad and Ki67 for G-heporgs treated with IGF2. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Scale bar = 50 μm. K Western blot assessment for the expression of p-AKT(Thr308), AKT, p-GSK3β(Ser9) and GSK3β in G-heporgs after different treatments. L Schematic illustration of cell-cell interactions between G-heporgs and S-heporgs. Results were presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using one‑way ANOVA followed by Tukey post‑test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Human Il 32 γ Elisa Kit, supplied by MyBiosource Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/IL32+ELISA+Kits/human+il+17c+elisa/pmc04298422-101-15-18
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human il-32 γ elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Sinobio Chemistry Co Ltd il-32 elisa kit
A KEGG pathway analysis of G-heporgs and S-heporgs. B Heatmap showing ligands and receptors in G-heporgs and S-heporgs. C Matched signaling of <t>IGF2</t> and IGF1R using STRING database. D Expressions of IGF2 and IGF1R were analyzed by RT-qPCR in different organoids. n = 4 biologically independent experiments. E IGF2 secretion from culture medium at different days (day 1 was the first day that observed the generation of G-heporgs). n = 4 biologically independent experiments. F Immunostaining for IGF1R and Ki67. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Scale bar = 25 μm. G Experimental strategy to evaluate the effect of exogenous IGF2 and LY294002 (PI3K-AKT inhibitor) on G-heporgs. H Representative morphologies of G-heporgs after the treatment with or without IGF2 and LY294002 at different days. Scale bar = 100 μm. I Quantification of the formation efficiency ( n = 4 biologically independent experiments) and diameter ( n = 40 organoids) of G-heporgs at day 14 after different treatments. J Immunostaining of ASGPR, HNF4α, ALB, Ecad and Ki67 for G-heporgs treated with IGF2. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Scale bar = 50 μm. K Western blot assessment for the expression of p-AKT(Thr308), AKT, p-GSK3β(Ser9) and GSK3β in G-heporgs after different treatments. L Schematic illustration of cell-cell interactions between G-heporgs and S-heporgs. Results were presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using one‑way ANOVA followed by Tukey post‑test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Il 32 Elisa Kit, supplied by Sinobio Chemistry Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/IL32+ELISA+Kits/il+32+elisa+kit/pm37708356-89-8-9
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
il-32 elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Sino Biological il32
A KEGG pathway analysis of G-heporgs and S-heporgs. B Heatmap showing ligands and receptors in G-heporgs and S-heporgs. C Matched signaling of <t>IGF2</t> and IGF1R using STRING database. D Expressions of IGF2 and IGF1R were analyzed by RT-qPCR in different organoids. n = 4 biologically independent experiments. E IGF2 secretion from culture medium at different days (day 1 was the first day that observed the generation of G-heporgs). n = 4 biologically independent experiments. F Immunostaining for IGF1R and Ki67. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Scale bar = 25 μm. G Experimental strategy to evaluate the effect of exogenous IGF2 and LY294002 (PI3K-AKT inhibitor) on G-heporgs. H Representative morphologies of G-heporgs after the treatment with or without IGF2 and LY294002 at different days. Scale bar = 100 μm. I Quantification of the formation efficiency ( n = 4 biologically independent experiments) and diameter ( n = 40 organoids) of G-heporgs at day 14 after different treatments. J Immunostaining of ASGPR, HNF4α, ALB, Ecad and Ki67 for G-heporgs treated with IGF2. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Scale bar = 50 μm. K Western blot assessment for the expression of p-AKT(Thr308), AKT, p-GSK3β(Ser9) and GSK3β in G-heporgs after different treatments. L Schematic illustration of cell-cell interactions between G-heporgs and S-heporgs. Results were presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using one‑way ANOVA followed by Tukey post‑test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Il32, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/IL32+ELISA+Kits/il32/custom%40il32%4034082709
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
il32 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


A KEGG pathway analysis of G-heporgs and S-heporgs. B Heatmap showing ligands and receptors in G-heporgs and S-heporgs. C Matched signaling of IGF2 and IGF1R using STRING database. D Expressions of IGF2 and IGF1R were analyzed by RT-qPCR in different organoids. n = 4 biologically independent experiments. E IGF2 secretion from culture medium at different days (day 1 was the first day that observed the generation of G-heporgs). n = 4 biologically independent experiments. F Immunostaining for IGF1R and Ki67. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Scale bar = 25 μm. G Experimental strategy to evaluate the effect of exogenous IGF2 and LY294002 (PI3K-AKT inhibitor) on G-heporgs. H Representative morphologies of G-heporgs after the treatment with or without IGF2 and LY294002 at different days. Scale bar = 100 μm. I Quantification of the formation efficiency ( n = 4 biologically independent experiments) and diameter ( n = 40 organoids) of G-heporgs at day 14 after different treatments. J Immunostaining of ASGPR, HNF4α, ALB, Ecad and Ki67 for G-heporgs treated with IGF2. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Scale bar = 50 μm. K Western blot assessment for the expression of p-AKT(Thr308), AKT, p-GSK3β(Ser9) and GSK3β in G-heporgs after different treatments. L Schematic illustration of cell-cell interactions between G-heporgs and S-heporgs. Results were presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using one‑way ANOVA followed by Tukey post‑test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

Journal: Cell Death & Disease

Article Title: Generation of proliferative hESC-derived grape-clustered hepatocyte organoids with multipolar architecture as regenerative counterpart via synergy of YAP and IGF2 pathways

doi: 10.1038/s41419-026-08635-y

Figure Lengend Snippet: A KEGG pathway analysis of G-heporgs and S-heporgs. B Heatmap showing ligands and receptors in G-heporgs and S-heporgs. C Matched signaling of IGF2 and IGF1R using STRING database. D Expressions of IGF2 and IGF1R were analyzed by RT-qPCR in different organoids. n = 4 biologically independent experiments. E IGF2 secretion from culture medium at different days (day 1 was the first day that observed the generation of G-heporgs). n = 4 biologically independent experiments. F Immunostaining for IGF1R and Ki67. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Scale bar = 25 μm. G Experimental strategy to evaluate the effect of exogenous IGF2 and LY294002 (PI3K-AKT inhibitor) on G-heporgs. H Representative morphologies of G-heporgs after the treatment with or without IGF2 and LY294002 at different days. Scale bar = 100 μm. I Quantification of the formation efficiency ( n = 4 biologically independent experiments) and diameter ( n = 40 organoids) of G-heporgs at day 14 after different treatments. J Immunostaining of ASGPR, HNF4α, ALB, Ecad and Ki67 for G-heporgs treated with IGF2. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Scale bar = 50 μm. K Western blot assessment for the expression of p-AKT(Thr308), AKT, p-GSK3β(Ser9) and GSK3β in G-heporgs after different treatments. L Schematic illustration of cell-cell interactions between G-heporgs and S-heporgs. Results were presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using one‑way ANOVA followed by Tukey post‑test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

Article Snippet: The concentrations of IGF2, IL32, and CCL20 were quantified using a Human IGF2 ELISA kit (Jingmei Biotechnology, JM-0862H2), a Human IL32 ELISA kit (SAB), and a Human CCL20 ELISA kit (Jingmei Biotechnology, JM-5919H2), respectively, according to the manufacturers’ instructions.

Techniques: Quantitative RT-PCR, Immunostaining, Staining, Western Blot, Expressing

A Representative images of G-heporgs after the treatment with YAP agonist (GA017) or inhibitor (Verteporfin) in optimized heporg medium (OHM). B Relative cell number ( n = 4 biologically independent experiments) and organoid diameter ( n = 30 organoids) of G-heporgs at day 5 after the treatment. C Representative morphologies of G-heporgs after the treatment with GA017 at different days. Scale bar = 100 μm. D Immunostaining of Factin and YAP. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Scale bar = 50 μm. Yellow arrows indicate YAP with nuclear localization, red arrows indicate YAP without nuclear localization. E The quantification of YAP nuclear localization. n = 4 biologically independent experiments. F H&E staining for G-heporgs treated with or without GA017, and the quantification of the percentage of cysts in organoids. Scale bar = 100 μm. n = 4 biologically independent experiments. G Heatmap of G-heporgs treated with or without GA017 for genes related to proliferation, mature and YAP. H GSEA analysis. I The relative fold increment of G-heporgs in the EM with GA017 or IGF2. Each dot represents a passage event. n = 4 biologically independent experiments. Results were presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using two‑way repeated measures ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test, one‑way ANOVA followed by Tukey post‑test and unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. *** p < 0.001.

Journal: Cell Death & Disease

Article Title: Generation of proliferative hESC-derived grape-clustered hepatocyte organoids with multipolar architecture as regenerative counterpart via synergy of YAP and IGF2 pathways

doi: 10.1038/s41419-026-08635-y

Figure Lengend Snippet: A Representative images of G-heporgs after the treatment with YAP agonist (GA017) or inhibitor (Verteporfin) in optimized heporg medium (OHM). B Relative cell number ( n = 4 biologically independent experiments) and organoid diameter ( n = 30 organoids) of G-heporgs at day 5 after the treatment. C Representative morphologies of G-heporgs after the treatment with GA017 at different days. Scale bar = 100 μm. D Immunostaining of Factin and YAP. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Scale bar = 50 μm. Yellow arrows indicate YAP with nuclear localization, red arrows indicate YAP without nuclear localization. E The quantification of YAP nuclear localization. n = 4 biologically independent experiments. F H&E staining for G-heporgs treated with or without GA017, and the quantification of the percentage of cysts in organoids. Scale bar = 100 μm. n = 4 biologically independent experiments. G Heatmap of G-heporgs treated with or without GA017 for genes related to proliferation, mature and YAP. H GSEA analysis. I The relative fold increment of G-heporgs in the EM with GA017 or IGF2. Each dot represents a passage event. n = 4 biologically independent experiments. Results were presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using two‑way repeated measures ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test, one‑way ANOVA followed by Tukey post‑test and unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. *** p < 0.001.

Article Snippet: The concentrations of IGF2, IL32, and CCL20 were quantified using a Human IGF2 ELISA kit (Jingmei Biotechnology, JM-0862H2), a Human IL32 ELISA kit (SAB), and a Human CCL20 ELISA kit (Jingmei Biotechnology, JM-5919H2), respectively, according to the manufacturers’ instructions.

Techniques: Immunostaining, Staining, Two Tailed Test